Disaster response

Earthquake damage, shelters, wards and a situation report

Kathmandu, Nepalsynthetic data, real placeMaps, charts and report
The question

Where is damage worst and clustered, how did the assessments progress over time, and which wards have the most displaced people?

A response coordination cell uploads building damage assessments, shelters, wards with population, road status, water points, health posts, distributions, daily ward needs and a shelter register, and a situation report. It wants to know where damage is worst and which wards lack shelter capacity.

27.7000, 85.3200data covers about 8 by 7 km
10datasets uploaded
19output layers
20maps made
27charts made
39findings
409 sStart run time

Every map and chart this run made is here. 20 map images, 27 charts and the cited report (PDF, Word, Markdown), as exported on 2026-10-22.

Findings (first few)

  • Evidenced: The timeline counts 2,900 dated events in Damage assessments, Road status, Relief distributions and 1 more per day, from 2026-09-02 to 2026-09-22 12345.
  • Evidenced: By dataset: Damage assessments 2,000; Ward needs by day 420; Relief distributions 320; Road status 160 1.
  • Evidenced: The trend is -3.48 events per day; the second half of the days has 1,177 against 1,586 in the first (-25.8%) 1.
  • Evidenced: The project's documents name 1 date inside this span, drawn as dotted lines; the most named is 2026-09-14 (Situation report No 6.
  • Evidenced: 4, page 1, 1 mention) 6.

What Start ran

Describe mode, the local model only (no paid model); run status succeeded, 8 analyst agents.

gp_calculate_densitygp_find_point_clustersgp_hot_spotsgp_near_repeatgp_outliersgp_space_time_hot_spotsgp_summarize_within

Maps

Every map image this run exported, with legend, north arrow and scale bar. Select one to view it full size.

Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions
Hot spot analysis: Relief distributionsFig. 2
Hot spot analysis: Water points
Hot spot analysis: Water pointsFig. 3
Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments
Hot spot analysis: Damage assessmentsFig. 4
Emerging hot spots: Relief distributions
Emerging hot spots: Relief distributionsFig. 5
Emerging hot spots: Damage assessments
Emerging hot spots: Damage assessmentsFig. 6
Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions
Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributionsFig. 7
Summarize within: Wards
Summarize within: WardsFig. 8
Summarize within: Wards
Summarize within: WardsFig. 9
Summarize within: Wards
Summarize within: WardsFig. 10
Find point clusters: Shelters
Find point clusters: SheltersFig. 11
Find point clusters: cluster hulls
Find point clusters: cluster hullsFig. 12
Find point clusters: Relief distributions
Find point clusters: Relief distributionsFig. 13
Find point clusters: cluster hulls
Find point clusters: cluster hullsFig. 14
Find point clusters: Health posts
Find point clusters: Health postsFig. 15
Find point clusters: cluster hulls
Find point clusters: cluster hullsFig. 16
Calculate density: Shelters
Calculate density: SheltersFig. 17
Calculate density: Relief distributions
Calculate density: Relief distributionsFig. 18
Calculate density: Health posts
Calculate density: Health postsFig. 19
Wards by population
Wards by populationFig. 20
Find outliers: Wards
Find outliers: WardsFig. 21

Charts

Every chart image this run exported.

Water points over time (litres_per_day)
Water points over time (litres_per_day)Fig. 22
Relief distributions over time (date)
Relief distributions over time (date)Fig. 23
Ward needs by day over time (date)
Ward needs by day over time (date)Fig. 24
Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions
Hot spot analysis: Relief distributionsFig. 25
Hot spot analysis: Water points
Hot spot analysis: Water pointsFig. 26
Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments
Hot spot analysis: Damage assessmentsFig. 27
Emerging hot spots: Relief distributions
Emerging hot spots: Relief distributionsFig. 28
Emerging hot spots: Damage assessments
Emerging hot spots: Damage assessmentsFig. 29
Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions
Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributionsFig. 30
Summarize within: Wards
Summarize within: WardsFig. 31
Summarize within: Wards
Summarize within: WardsFig. 32
Summarize within: Wards
Summarize within: WardsFig. 33
Find point clusters: Shelters
Find point clusters: SheltersFig. 34
Find point clusters: cluster hulls
Find point clusters: cluster hullsFig. 35
Find point clusters: Relief distributions
Find point clusters: Relief distributionsFig. 36
Find point clusters: cluster hulls
Find point clusters: cluster hullsFig. 37
Find point clusters: Health posts
Find point clusters: Health postsFig. 38
Find point clusters: cluster hulls
Find point clusters: cluster hullsFig. 39
Calculate density: Shelters
Calculate density: SheltersFig. 40
Calculate density: Relief distributions
Calculate density: Relief distributionsFig. 41
Calculate density: Health posts
Calculate density: Health postsFig. 42
Find outliers: Wards
Find outliers: WardsFig. 43
Find point clusters: Relief distributions over time
Find point clusters: Relief distributions over timeFig. 44
Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions over time
Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions over timeFig. 45
Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments over time
Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments over timeFig. 46
Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions over time
Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions over timeFig. 47
Timeline: events per day by dataset
Timeline: events per day by datasetFig. 1

The cited report

Sample: Disaster response, Kathmandu: report

Project: Sample: Disaster response, Kathmandu
Goal: Describe the project Sample: Disaster response, Kathmandu: run the analyses that tell the most about its data, draw every result, and write a cited report.
Run: 2199067b-8747-4c82-b083-7c3d54abda8f (running, 11 agent run(s))
Generated: 2026-10-18T05:36:27Z, version 1
Model cost: USD 0.0000 over 0 model call(s)

Data used

DataKindRowsTime spanSummarySource
Wardsvector, Polygon2020 polygon (area) features; 'population' 26,870 to 97,681 (mean 5.61e+04); 'households' 6,248 to 22,716 (mean 1.305e+04); named by 'name' (e.g. Ward 1 Oakwood, Ward 2 Ashby Green, Ward 3 Cedar Vale); total area 56.01 km2; extent 85.2789,27.6679 to 85.3610,27.7321. Areas (Wards) with population to compare and map.96
Damage assessmentsvector, Point2,0002026-09-02 to 2026-09-222,000 point features; dated by 'assessed_at' from 2026-09-02 to 2026-09-22; 'occupancy' has 4 values (top: residential 792, commercial 425, school 397); 'construction' has 3 values (top: RC frame 680, brick in mud 671, brick in cement 649); 'damage_grade' 1 to 5 (mean 2.374); 'storeys' 1 to 5 (mean 2.846); 'people_displaced' 0 to 14 (mean 3.328); extent 85.2803,27.6689 to 85.3599,27.7310. Dated point events by occupancy: where and when Damage assessments happen.2
Sheltersvector, Point2525 point features; 'type' has 3 values (top: open space 10, school 9, tent camp 6); 'capacity' 150 to 1,200 (mean 716); named by 'name' (e.g. Elmstead open space shelter, Hawthorn Rise open space shelter, Kingsmead open space shelter); extent 85.2832,27.6721 to 85.3569,27.7277. Point locations of Shelters by type.97
Road statusvector, LineString1602026-09-03 to 2026-09-20160 line features; dated by 'updated_on' from 2026-09-03 to 2026-09-20; 'status' has 3 values (top: open 122, restricted 21, blocked 17); 'cause' has 1 values (top: debris 38); named by 'name' (e.g. Tol Path, Bagh Path, Pul Path); total length 26.39 km; extent 85.2805,27.6687 to 85.3596,27.7311. Lines (Road status) such as routes or networks.3
Water pointsvector, Point6060 point features; 'type' has 3 values (top: well 27, tap stand 17, tanker point 16); 'working' has 2 values (top: True 48, False 12); 'litres_per_day' 3,306 to 43,201 (mean 1.409e+04); extent 85.2811,27.6709 to 85.3594,27.7290. Point locations of Water points by type.98
Health postsvector, Point2020 point features; 'functional' has 2 values (top: True 14, False 6); 'beds' 5 to 25 (mean 14.7); named by 'name' (e.g. Health post Ashby Green, Health post Cedar Vale, Health post Elmstead); extent 85.2869,27.6701 to 85.3532,27.7259. Point locations of Health posts by functional.99
Relief distributionsvector, Point3202026-09-04 to 2026-09-22320 point features; dated by 'date' from 2026-09-04 to 2026-09-22; 'item' has 4 values (top: blanket 87, tarpaulin 85, hygiene kit 77); 'agency' has 3 values (top: relief society 109, municipality 108, NGO partner 103); 'households_served' 21 to 400 (mean 209.4); extent 85.2828,27.6718 to 85.3572,27.7279. Dated point events by item: where and when Relief distributions happen.4
Ward needs by daytable4202026-09-02 to 2026-09-22Table of 420 rows and 5 columns without geometry; dated by 'date' from 2026-09-02 to 2026-09-22; 'ward_code' has 20 values (top: W01 21, W02 21, W03 21); 'households_need_shelter' 62 to 1,174 (mean 276.6); 'water_l_per_person' 11 to 32 (mean 21.77); 'food_kits_needed' 51 to 503 (mean 155.4). A table of Ward needs by day without locations.5
Shelter registertable25Table of 25 rows and 5 columns without geometry; 'managed_by' has 3 values (top: NGO 11, municipality 8, army 6); 'capacity' 150 to 1,200 (mean 716); 'occupants' 98 to 1,663 (mean 808.5); 'toilets' 4 to 30 (mean 18.84). A table of Shelter register without locations.100
Situation report No. 4document1-page pdf document 'Situation report No. 4'; language en; mentions 4 place(s): Ward 20 Upton Vale (1), 27.68758, 85.33803 (1), Ward (1), Elmstead open space shelter (1). A document about Ward 20 Upton Vale, 27.68758, 85.33803, Ward.101
Sample: Disaster response, Kathmandurecord102
Hot spot analysis: Relief distributionslayer, Point320103
Hot spot analysis: Water pointslayer, Polygon20104
Hot spot analysis: Damage assessmentslayer, Point2,000105
Emerging hot spots: Relief distributionslayer, Polygon54106
Emerging hot spots: Damage assessmentslayer, Polygon87107
Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributionslayer, Point320108
Summarize within: Wardslayer, Polygon20109
Summarize within: Wardslayer, Polygon20110
Summarize within: Wardslayer, Polygon20111
Find point clusters: Shelterslayer, Point25112
Find point clusters: cluster hullslayer, Polygon1113
Find point clusters: Relief distributionslayer, Point320114
Find point clusters: cluster hullslayer, Polygon21115
Find point clusters: Health postslayer, Point20116
Find point clusters: cluster hullslayer, Polygon2117
Calculate density: Shelterslayer, Polygon90118
Calculate density: Relief distributionslayer, Polygon222119
Calculate density: Health postslayer, Polygon228120
Situation report No. 4document121
Find outliers: Wardslayer, Polygon20122

Timeline

Timeline: events per day by dataset
Figure 1. Timeline: events per day by dataset 1. Per day, 2026-09-02 to 2026-09-22. Source: Damage assessments, Road status, Relief distributions, Ward needs by day (2,900 features). Dotted lines mark dates named in the project's documents. The data is in the appendix.

The timeline counts 2,900 dated events in Damage assessments, Road status, Relief distributions and 1 more per day, from 2026-09-02 to 2026-09-22 12345. By dataset: Damage assessments 2,000; Ward needs by day 420; Relief distributions 320; Road status 160 1. The trend is -3.48 events per day; the second half of the days has 1,177 against 1,586 in the first (-25.8%) 1. The project's documents name 1 date inside this span, drawn as dotted lines; the most named is 2026-09-14 (Situation report No 6. 4, page 1, 1 mention) 6.

Busiest days

  • 2026-09-05: 181 events 1
  • 2026-09-04: 170 events 1
  • 2026-09-03: 164 events 1

Quietest days

  • 2026-09-21: 96 events 1
  • 2026-09-22: 102 events 1
  • 2026-09-20: 104 events 1

Hot spots

What this analysis is. Hot spot analysis: Getis-Ord Gi* hot and cold spots with z-scores, p-values and confidence bins 7. In ArcGIS it is Find Hot Spots or Hot Spot Analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*); in QGIS, qgis:hotspot (plugin) 7.

Why it was run on this data. 320 points: Getis-Ord Gi* tests whether the concentrations in Relief distributions are statistically significant 8.

What it found. Hot spot analysis was performed using the Relief distributions layer 10. The resulting analysis generated 320 features 9 and took 5 milliseconds to complete 9. The total billing cost for this operation was 0.0564 9.

ResultValue
result, count320
result, elapsed ms5
result, excluded null0
result, distance band m1,000
billing, cost0.0564
billing, list price0.0564
billing, upstream cost0

Findings

  • Evidenced: Hot spots on Relief distributions: Hot spot analysis: 1 layer saved: Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions (320 features) 910.
  • Evidenced: It reported result, count 320; result, elapsed ms 5; result, excluded null 0; result, distance band m 1,000; billing, cost 0.0564; billing, list price 0.0564 9.

Tool gp_hot_spots; parameters {"field": "households_served", "project": "affd1e20-248c-4f96-b09d-48d3027477be", "features": {"layer": "Relief distributions (83cbe688)"}, "aggregation": "hexagon", "cell_size_m": 1000.0, "distance_band_m": 1000.0}

Hot spots

What this analysis is. Hot spot analysis: Getis-Ord Gi* hot and cold spots with z-scores, p-values and confidence bins 7. In ArcGIS it is Find Hot Spots or Hot Spot Analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*); in QGIS, qgis:hotspot (plugin) 7.

Why it was run on this data. 60 points: Getis-Ord Gi* tests whether the concentrations in Water points are statistically significant 11.

What it found. The hot spot analysis used "Water points" as its input 13. The process saved one layer titled "Hot spot analysis: Water points (20 features)" 12. Results for the analysis indicated 20 bins and 20 counts, based on a cell size of 2,000 m 12. The final billing cost associated with this analysis was 0.0512 12.

ResultValue
result, bins20
result, count20
result, elapsed ms3
result, cell size m2,000
result, incidents used60
result, distance band m2,000
billing, cost0.0512
billing, list price0.0512
billing, upstream cost0

Findings

  • Evidenced: Hot spots on Water points: Hot spot analysis: 1 layer saved: Hot spot analysis: Water points (20 features) 1213.
  • Evidenced: It reported result, bins 20; result, count 20; result, elapsed ms 3; result, cell size m 2,000; result, incidents used 60; result, distance band m 2,000 12.

Tool gp_hot_spots; parameters {"project": "affd1e20-248c-4f96-b09d-48d3027477be", "features": {"layer": "Water points (2a061d8c)"}, "aggregation": "hexagon", "cell_size_m": 2000.0, "distance_band_m": 2000.0}

Hot spots

What this analysis is. Hot spot analysis: Getis-Ord Gi* hot and cold spots with z-scores, p-values and confidence bins 7. In ArcGIS it is Find Hot Spots or Hot Spot Analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*); in QGIS, qgis:hotspot (plugin) 7.

Why it was run on this data. 2000 points: Getis-Ord Gi* tests whether the concentrations in Damage assessments are statistically significant 14.

What it found. The hot spot analysis successfully generated one saved layer titled "Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments" 15.

ResultValue
result, count2,000
result, elapsed ms35
result, excluded null0
result, distance band m500
billing, cost0.09
billing, list price0.09
billing, upstream cost0

Findings

  • Evidenced: Hot spots on Damage assessments: Hot spot analysis: 1 layer saved: Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments (2000 features) 1516.
  • Evidenced: It reported result, count 2,000; result, elapsed ms 35; result, excluded null 0; result, distance band m 500; billing, cost 0.09; billing, list price 0.09 15.

Tool gp_hot_spots; parameters {"field": "people_displaced", "project": "affd1e20-248c-4f96-b09d-48d3027477be", "features": {"layer": "Damage assessments (26bd99f3)"}, "aggregation": "hexagon", "cell_size_m": 500.0, "distance_band_m": 500.0}

Space time hot spots

What this analysis is. Emerging hot spots: Where hot spots are new, consecutive, intensifying, persistent, diminishing, sporadic, oscillating or historical over time 17. In ArcGIS it is Emerging Hot Spot Analysis or Create Space Time Cube 17.

Why it was run on this data. Relief distributions carry dates in 'date': emerging hot spot analysis finds new, intensifying and fading hot spots per day 18.

What it found. Space time hot spots on Relief distributions: Emerging hot spots: 1 layer saved: Emerging hot spots: Relief distributions (54 features) 1019. It reported result, count 54; result, elapsed ms 10; result, resolution 8; result, features used 320; result, time neighbors 0; billing, cost 0.116 19.

ResultValue
result, count54
result, elapsed ms10
result, resolution8
result, features used320
result, time neighbors0
billing, cost0.116
billing, list price0.116
billing, upstream cost0

Findings

  • Evidenced: Space time hot spots on Relief distributions: Emerging hot spots: 1 layer saved: Emerging hot spots: Relief distributions (54 features) 1019.
  • Evidenced: It reported result, count 54; result, elapsed ms 10; result, resolution 8; result, features used 320; result, time neighbors 0; billing, cost 0.116 19.

Tool gp_space_time_hot_spots; parameters {"agg": "sum", "project": "affd1e20-248c-4f96-b09d-48d3027477be", "features": {"layer": "Relief distributions (83cbe688)"}, "interval": "day", "bin_shape": "h3", "resolution": 8, "time_field": "date", "value_field": "households_served"}

Space time hot spots

What this analysis is. Emerging hot spots: Where hot spots are new, consecutive, intensifying, persistent, diminishing, sporadic, oscillating or historical over time 17. In ArcGIS it is Emerging Hot Spot Analysis or Create Space Time Cube 17.

Why it was run on this data. Damage assessments carry dates in 'assessed_at': emerging hot spot analysis finds new, intensifying and fading hot spots per day 20.

What it found. Space time hot spots on Damage assessments: Emerging hot spots: 1 layer saved: Emerging hot spots: Damage assessments (87 features) 1621. It reported result, count 87; result, elapsed ms 18; result, resolution 8; result, features used 2,000; result, time neighbors 0; billing, cost 0.2 21.

ResultValue
result, count87
result, elapsed ms18
result, resolution8
result, features used2,000
result, time neighbors0
billing, cost0.2
billing, list price0.2
billing, upstream cost0

Findings

  • Evidenced: Space time hot spots on Damage assessments: Emerging hot spots: 1 layer saved: Emerging hot spots: Damage assessments (87 features) 1621.
  • Evidenced: It reported result, count 87; result, elapsed ms 18; result, resolution 8; result, features used 2,000; result, time neighbors 0; billing, cost 0.2 21.

Tool gp_space_time_hot_spots; parameters {"agg": "sum", "project": "affd1e20-248c-4f96-b09d-48d3027477be", "features": {"layer": "Damage assessments (26bd99f3)"}, "interval": "day", "bin_shape": "h3", "resolution": 8, "time_field": "assessed_at", "value_field": "people_displaced"}

Near repeat

What this analysis is. Repeat and near repeat classification: Classify incidents as originators, repeats (same place) or near repeats within a distance and time window, with a Knox test table 22. In ArcGIS it is Repeat and Near Repeat Classification or Near Repeat Calculator 22.

Why it was run on this data. Near repeat analysis tests whether Relief distributions close in space also follow each other within 3 days 23.

What it found. Near repeat on Relief distributions: Repeat and near repeat classification: 1 layer saved: Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions (320 features) 1024. It reported result, days 3; result, count 320; result, chains 41; result, distance m 500; result, elapsed ms 13; result, pairs linked 742 24.

ResultValue
result, days3
result, count320
result, chains41
result, distance m500
result, elapsed ms13
result, pairs linked742
billing, cost0.0596
billing, list price0.0596
billing, upstream cost0

Findings

  • Evidenced: Near repeat on Relief distributions: Repeat and near repeat classification: 1 layer saved: Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions (320 features) 1024.
  • Evidenced: It reported result, days 3; result, count 320; result, chains 41; result, distance m 500; result, elapsed ms 13; result, pairs linked 742 24.

Tool gp_near_repeat; parameters {"days": 3, "project": "affd1e20-248c-4f96-b09d-48d3027477be", "features": {"layer": "Relief distributions (83cbe688)"}, "distance_m": 500.0, "time_field": "date"}

Summarize within

What this analysis is. Summarize within: Count and aggregate the features inside each polygon (or bin), proportionally for lines and polygons 25. In ArcGIS it is Summarize Within or Aggregate Points; in QGIS, native:countpointsinpolygon or native:sumlinelengths 25.

Why it was run on this data. Count Shelters inside each feature of Wards by type; the counts map as a choropleth (natural breaks, sequential colors) 26.

What it found. Summarize within on Shelters, Wards: Summarize within: 1 layer saved: Summarize within: Wards (20 features) 272829. It reported result, count 20; result, elapsed ms 0; billing, cost 0.01092; billing, list price 0.01092; billing, upstream cost 0 27.

ResultValue
result, count20
result, elapsed ms0
billing, cost0.01092
billing, list price0.01092
billing, upstream cost0

Findings

  • Evidenced: Summarize within on Shelters, Wards: Summarize within: 1 layer saved: Summarize within: Wards (20 features) 272829.
  • Evidenced: It reported result, count 20; result, elapsed ms 0; billing, cost 0.01092; billing, list price 0.01092; billing, upstream cost 0 27.

Tool gp_summarize_within; parameters {"stats": [{"stat": "sum", "field": "capacity"}], "project": "affd1e20-248c-4f96-b09d-48d3027477be", "features": {"layer": "Shelters (ee1b31b2)"}, "group_by": "type", "polygons": {"layer": "Wards (b338e26e)"}}

Summarize within

What this analysis is. Summarize within: Count and aggregate the features inside each polygon (or bin), proportionally for lines and polygons 25. In ArcGIS it is Summarize Within or Aggregate Points; in QGIS, native:countpointsinpolygon or native:sumlinelengths 25.

Why it was run on this data. Count Shelters inside each feature of Wards by type; the counts map as a choropleth (natural breaks, sequential colors) 26.

What it found. Summarize within on Relief distributions, Wards: Summarize within: 1 layer saved: Summarize within: Wards (20 features) 102930. It reported result, count 20; result, elapsed ms 1; billing, cost 0.01682; billing, list price 0.01682; billing, upstream cost 0 30.

ResultValue
result, count20
result, elapsed ms1
billing, cost0.01682
billing, list price0.01682
billing, upstream cost0

Findings

  • Evidenced: Summarize within on Relief distributions, Wards: Summarize within: 1 layer saved: Summarize within: Wards (20 features) 102930.
  • Evidenced: It reported result, count 20; result, elapsed ms 1; billing, cost 0.01682; billing, list price 0.01682; billing, upstream cost 0 30.

Tool gp_summarize_within; parameters {"stats": [{"stat": "sum", "field": "households_served"}], "project": "affd1e20-248c-4f96-b09d-48d3027477be", "features": {"layer": "Relief distributions (83cbe688)"}, "group_by": "item", "polygons": {"layer": "Wards (b338e26e)"}}

Summarize within

What this analysis is. Summarize within: Count and aggregate the features inside each polygon (or bin), proportionally for lines and polygons 25. In ArcGIS it is Summarize Within or Aggregate Points; in QGIS, native:countpointsinpolygon or native:sumlinelengths 25.

Why it was run on this data. Count Shelters inside each feature of Wards by type; the counts map as a choropleth (natural breaks, sequential colors) 26.

What it found. Summarize within on Health posts, Wards: Summarize within: 1 layer saved: Summarize within: Wards (20 features) 293132. It reported result, count 20; result, elapsed ms 0; billing, cost 0.01082; billing, list price 0.01082; billing, upstream cost 0 31.

ResultValue
result, count20
result, elapsed ms0
billing, cost0.01082
billing, list price0.01082
billing, upstream cost0

Findings

  • Evidenced: Summarize within on Health posts, Wards: Summarize within: 1 layer saved: Summarize within: Wards (20 features) 293132.
  • Evidenced: It reported result, count 20; result, elapsed ms 0; billing, cost 0.01082; billing, list price 0.01082; billing, upstream cost 0 31.

Tool gp_summarize_within; parameters {"stats": [{"stat": "sum", "field": "beds"}], "project": "affd1e20-248c-4f96-b09d-48d3027477be", "features": {"layer": "Health posts (7aed59a8)"}, "group_by": "functional", "polygons": {"layer": "Wards (b338e26e)"}}

Find point clusters

What this analysis is. Find point clusters: Density-based clusters (DBSCAN, HDBSCAN or OPTICS, optionally space-time) with hulls and noise 33. In ArcGIS it is Find Point Clusters or Density-based Clustering; in QGIS, native:dbscanclustering or native:stdbscanclustering 33.

Why it was run on this data. DBSCAN finds dense groups of Shelters and separates noise 34.

What it found. The gp_find_point_clusters tool was used on the Shelters data 28 to identify point clusters. The process resulted in a count of 25 clusters and 2 noise points 35. The output contained 2 layers, specifically listing "Shelters (25 features)" and "cluster hulls (1 feature)" 35. The computation was efficient, completing in an elapsed time of 4 ms 35.

ResultValue
result, count25
result, noise2
result, distance m2,000
result, elapsed ms4
result, min points3
billing, cost0.0505
billing, list price0.0505
billing, upstream cost0

Findings

  • Evidenced: Find point clusters on Shelters: Find point clusters: 2 layers saved: Find point clusters: Shelters (25 features); Find point clusters: cluster hulls (1 feature) 2835.
  • Evidenced: It reported result, count 25; result, noise 2; result, distance m 2,000; result, elapsed ms 4; result, min points 3; billing, cost 0.0505 35.

Tool gp_find_point_clusters; parameters {"method": "dbscan", "project": "affd1e20-248c-4f96-b09d-48d3027477be", "features": {"layer": "Shelters (ee1b31b2)"}, "distance_m": 2000.0, "min_points": 3}

Find point clusters

What this analysis is. Find point clusters: Density-based clusters (DBSCAN, HDBSCAN or OPTICS, optionally space-time) with hulls and noise 33. In ArcGIS it is Find Point Clusters or Density-based Clustering; in QGIS, native:dbscanclustering or native:stdbscanclustering 33.

Why it was run on this data. DBSCAN finds dense groups of Relief distributions and separates noise 36.

What it found. Find point clusters on Relief distributions: Find point clusters: 2 layers saved: Find point clusters: Relief distributions (320 features); Find point clusters: cluster hulls (21 features) 1037. It reported result, count 320; result, noise 12; result, distance m 500; result, elapsed ms 10; result, min points 8; billing, cost 0.0564 37.

ResultValue
result, count320
result, noise12
result, distance m500
result, elapsed ms10
result, min points8
billing, cost0.0564
billing, list price0.0564
billing, upstream cost0

Findings

  • Evidenced: Find point clusters on Relief distributions: Find point clusters: 2 layers saved: Find point clusters: Relief distributions (320 features); Find point clusters: cluster hulls (21 features) 1037.
  • Evidenced: It reported result, count 320; result, noise 12; result, distance m 500; result, elapsed ms 10; result, min points 8; billing, cost 0.0564 37.

Tool gp_find_point_clusters; parameters {"method": "dbscan", "project": "affd1e20-248c-4f96-b09d-48d3027477be", "features": {"layer": "Relief distributions (83cbe688)"}, "distance_m": 500.0, "min_points": 8}

Find point clusters

What this analysis is. Find point clusters: Density-based clusters (DBSCAN, HDBSCAN or OPTICS, optionally space-time) with hulls and noise 33. In ArcGIS it is Find Point Clusters or Density-based Clustering; in QGIS, native:dbscanclustering or native:stdbscanclustering 33.

Why it was run on this data. DBSCAN finds dense groups of Health posts and separates noise 38.

What it found. Find point clusters on Health posts: Find point clusters: 2 layers saved: Find point clusters: Health posts (20 features); Find point clusters: cluster hulls (2 features) 3239. It reported result, count 20; result, noise 1; result, distance m 2,000; result, elapsed ms 1; result, min points 3; billing, cost 0.0504 39.

ResultValue
result, count20
result, noise1
result, distance m2,000
result, elapsed ms1
result, min points3
billing, cost0.0504
billing, list price0.0504
billing, upstream cost0

Findings

  • Evidenced: Find point clusters on Health posts: Find point clusters: 2 layers saved: Find point clusters: Health posts (20 features); Find point clusters: cluster hulls (2 features) 3239.
  • Evidenced: It reported result, count 20; result, noise 1; result, distance m 2,000; result, elapsed ms 1; result, min points 3; billing, cost 0.0504 39.

Tool gp_find_point_clusters; parameters {"method": "dbscan", "project": "affd1e20-248c-4f96-b09d-48d3027477be", "features": {"layer": "Health posts (7aed59a8)"}, "distance_m": 2000.0, "min_points": 3}

Calculate density

What this analysis is. Calculate density: Kernel density per square kilometer on a grid 40. In ArcGIS it is Calculate Density or Kernel Density; in QGIS, native:heatmapkerneldensityestimation 40.

Why it was run on this data. 25 points in Shelters: a density surface shows where they concentrate 41.

What it found. Calculate density on Shelters: Calculate density: 1 layer saved: Calculate density: Shelters (90 features) 2842. It reported result, count 90; result, elapsed ms 4; result, bandwidth m 2,000; result, cell size m 1,000; result, excluded null 0; result, max density per km2 0.8364 42.

ResultValue
result, count90
result, elapsed ms4
result, bandwidth m2,000
result, cell size m1,000
result, excluded null0
result, max density per km20.8364
billing, cost0.0505
billing, list price0.0505
billing, upstream cost0

Findings

  • Evidenced: Calculate density on Shelters: Calculate density: 1 layer saved: Calculate density: Shelters (90 features) 2842.
  • Evidenced: It reported result, count 90; result, elapsed ms 4; result, bandwidth m 2,000; result, cell size m 1,000; result, excluded null 0; result, max density per km2 0.8364 42.

Tool gp_calculate_density; parameters {"kernel": "quartic", "project": "affd1e20-248c-4f96-b09d-48d3027477be", "features": {"layer": "Shelters (ee1b31b2)"}, "bandwidth_m": 2000.0, "cell_size_m": 1000.0}

Calculate density

What this analysis is. Calculate density: Kernel density per square kilometer on a grid 40. In ArcGIS it is Calculate Density or Kernel Density; in QGIS, native:heatmapkerneldensityestimation 40.

Why it was run on this data. 320 points in Relief distributions: a density surface shows where they concentrate 43.

What it found. Calculate density on Relief distributions: Calculate density: 1 layer saved: Calculate density: Relief distributions (222 features) 1044. It reported result, count 222; result, elapsed ms 7; result, bandwidth m 1,000; result, cell size m 500; result, excluded null 0; result, max density per km2 5,070 44.

ResultValue
result, count222
result, elapsed ms7
result, bandwidth m1,000
result, cell size m500
result, excluded null0
result, max density per km25,070
billing, cost0.0564
billing, list price0.0564
billing, upstream cost0

Findings

  • Evidenced: Calculate density on Relief distributions: Calculate density: 1 layer saved: Calculate density: Relief distributions (222 features) 1044.
  • Evidenced: It reported result, count 222; result, elapsed ms 7; result, bandwidth m 1,000; result, cell size m 500; result, excluded null 0; result, max density per km2 5,070 44.

Tool gp_calculate_density; parameters {"kernel": "quartic", "project": "affd1e20-248c-4f96-b09d-48d3027477be", "features": {"layer": "Relief distributions (83cbe688)"}, "bandwidth_m": 1000.0, "cell_size_m": 500.0, "weight_field": "households_served"}

Calculate density

What this analysis is. Calculate density: Kernel density per square kilometer on a grid 40. In ArcGIS it is Calculate Density or Kernel Density; in QGIS, native:heatmapkerneldensityestimation 40.

Why it was run on this data. 20 points in Health posts: a density surface shows where they concentrate 45.

What it found. The density was calculated using the gp_calculate_density tool 46, processing the Health posts layer 32 across 228 features 46.

ResultValue
result, count228
result, elapsed ms6
result, bandwidth m5,000
result, cell size m1,000
result, excluded null0
result, max density per km26.578
billing, cost0.0504
billing, list price0.0504
billing, upstream cost0

Findings

  • Evidenced: Calculate density on Health posts: Calculate density: 1 layer saved: Calculate density: Health posts (228 features) 3246.
  • Evidenced: It reported result, count 228; result, elapsed ms 6; result, bandwidth m 5,000; result, cell size m 1,000; result, excluded null 0; result, max density per km2 6.578 46.

Tool gp_calculate_density; parameters {"kernel": "quartic", "project": "affd1e20-248c-4f96-b09d-48d3027477be", "features": {"layer": "Health posts (7aed59a8)"}, "bandwidth_m": 5000.0, "cell_size_m": 1000.0, "weight_field": "beds"}

Outliers

What this analysis is. Find outliers: Anselin local Moran’s I: HH, LL clusters and HL, LH outliers 47. In ArcGIS it is Find Outliers or Cluster and Outlier Analysis (Anselin Local Moran’s I) 47.

Why it was run on this data. Local Moran's I maps clusters and outliers of 'population' 48.

What it found. Outliers on Wards: Find outliers: 1 layer saved: Find outliers: Wards (20 features) 2949. It reported result, count 20; result, elapsed ms 4; result, permutations 199; result, excluded null 0; result, distance band m 1,735; billing, cost 0.0506 49.

ResultValue
result, count20
result, elapsed ms4
result, permutations199
result, excluded null0
result, distance band m1,735
billing, cost0.0506
billing, list price0.0506
billing, upstream cost0

Findings

  • Evidenced: Outliers on Wards: Find outliers: 1 layer saved: Find outliers: Wards (20 features) 2949.
  • Evidenced: It reported result, count 20; result, elapsed ms 4; result, permutations 199; result, excluded null 0; result, distance band m 1,735; billing, cost 0.0506 49.

Tool gp_outliers; parameters {"field": "population", "project": "affd1e20-248c-4f96-b09d-48d3027477be", "features": {"layer": "Wards (b338e26e)"}, "aggregation": "hexagon"}

Maps and charts

The run also made 20 map image(s) 5051525354555657585960616263646566676869 and 26 chart(s) 7071727374757677787980818283848586878889909192939495.

Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions
Figure 2. Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions 50
Hot spot analysis: Water points
Figure 3. Hot spot analysis: Water points 51
Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments
Figure 4. Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments 52
Emerging hot spots: Relief distributions
Figure 5. Emerging hot spots: Relief distributions 53
Emerging hot spots: Damage assessments
Figure 6. Emerging hot spots: Damage assessments 54
Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions
Figure 7. Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions 55
Summarize within: Wards
Figure 8. Summarize within: Wards 56
Summarize within: Wards
Figure 9. Summarize within: Wards 57
Summarize within: Wards
Figure 10. Summarize within: Wards 58
Find point clusters: Shelters
Figure 11. Find point clusters: Shelters 59
Find point clusters: cluster hulls
Figure 12. Find point clusters: cluster hulls 60
Find point clusters: Relief distributions
Figure 13. Find point clusters: Relief distributions 61
Find point clusters: cluster hulls
Figure 14. Find point clusters: cluster hulls 62
Find point clusters: Health posts
Figure 15. Find point clusters: Health posts 63
Find point clusters: cluster hulls
Figure 16. Find point clusters: cluster hulls 64
Calculate density: Shelters
Figure 17. Calculate density: Shelters 65
Calculate density: Relief distributions
Figure 18. Calculate density: Relief distributions 66
Calculate density: Health posts
Figure 19. Calculate density: Health posts 67
Wards by population
Figure 20. Wards by population 68
Find outliers: Wards
Figure 21. Find outliers: Wards 69

What the map shows. The map illustrates the results of an emerging hot spot analysis for relief distributions, categorizing areas based on detected patterns. The legend indicates that "Sporadic hot spot" areas are colored orange, while regions with "No pattern detected" are 53

Inferred: read from the image by gemma4:e4b, not evidence.

Water points over time (litres_per_day)
Figure 22. Water points over time (litres_per_day) 70. Source: Water points (60 features). The data is in the appendix.
Relief distributions over time (date)
Figure 23. Relief distributions over time (date) 71. Per day, 2026-09-04 to 2026-09-22. Source: Relief distributions (320 features). The data is in the appendix.
Ward needs by day over time (date)
Figure 24. Ward needs by day over time (date) 72. Per day, 2026-09-02 to 2026-09-22. Source: Ward needs by day (420 features). The data is in the appendix.
Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions
Figure 25. Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions 73. Period: 2026-09-04 to 2026-09-22 (date). Source: Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions (320 features). The data is in the appendix.
Hot spot analysis: Water points
Figure 26. Hot spot analysis: Water points 74. Source: Hot spot analysis: Water points (20 features). The data is in the appendix.
Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments
Figure 27. Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments 75. Period: 2026-09-02 to 2026-09-22 (assessed_at). Source: Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments (2,000 features). The data is in the appendix.
Emerging hot spots: Relief distributions
Figure 28. Emerging hot spots: Relief distributions 76. Source: Emerging hot spots: Relief distributions (54 features). The data is in the appendix.
Emerging hot spots: Damage assessments
Figure 29. Emerging hot spots: Damage assessments 77. Source: Emerging hot spots: Damage assessments (87 features). The data is in the appendix.
Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions
Figure 30. Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions 78. Per day, 2026-09-04 to 2026-09-22. Source: Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions (320 features). The data is in the appendix.
Summarize within: Wards
Figure 31. Summarize within: Wards 79. Source: Summarize within: Wards (20 features). The data is in the appendix.
Summarize within: Wards
Figure 32. Summarize within: Wards 80. Source: Summarize within: Wards (20 features). The data is in the appendix.
Summarize within: Wards
Figure 33. Summarize within: Wards 81. Source: Summarize within: Wards (20 features). The data is in the appendix.
Find point clusters: Shelters
Figure 34. Find point clusters: Shelters 82. Source: Find point clusters: Shelters (25 features). The data is in the appendix.
Find point clusters: cluster hulls
Figure 35. Find point clusters: cluster hulls 83. Source: Find point clusters: cluster hulls (1 features). The data is in the appendix.
Find point clusters: Relief distributions
Figure 36. Find point clusters: Relief distributions 84. Period: 2026-09-04 to 2026-09-22 (date). Source: Find point clusters: Relief distributions (320 features). The data is in the appendix.
Find point clusters: cluster hulls
Figure 37. Find point clusters: cluster hulls 85. Source: Find point clusters: cluster hulls (21 features). The data is in the appendix.
Find point clusters: Health posts
Figure 38. Find point clusters: Health posts 86. Source: Find point clusters: Health posts (20 features). The data is in the appendix.
Find point clusters: cluster hulls
Figure 39. Find point clusters: cluster hulls 87. Source: Find point clusters: cluster hulls (2 features). The data is in the appendix.
Calculate density: Shelters
Figure 40. Calculate density: Shelters 88. Source: Calculate density: Shelters (90 features). The data is in the appendix.
Calculate density: Relief distributions
Figure 41. Calculate density: Relief distributions 89. Source: Calculate density: Relief distributions (222 features). The data is in the appendix.
Calculate density: Health posts
Figure 42. Calculate density: Health posts 90. Source: Calculate density: Health posts (228 features). The data is in the appendix.
Find outliers: Wards
Figure 43. Find outliers: Wards 91. Source: Find outliers: Wards (20 features). The data is in the appendix.
Find point clusters: Relief distributions over time
Figure 44. Find point clusters: Relief distributions over time 92. Per day, 2026-09-04 to 2026-09-22. Source: Find point clusters: Relief distributions (320 features). The data is in the appendix.
Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions over time
Figure 45. Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions over time 93. Per day, 2026-09-04 to 2026-09-22. Source: Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions (320 features). The data is in the appendix.
Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments over time
Figure 46. Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments over time 94. Per day, 2026-09-02 to 2026-09-22. Source: Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments (2,000 features). The data is in the appendix.
Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions over time
Figure 47. Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions over time 95. Per day, 2026-09-04 to 2026-09-22. Source: Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions (320 features). The data is in the appendix.

Changes since the last run

This is the first report of this project.

Sources

  1. 1Rendering: Chart: Timeline: events per day by dataset. 84 rows id 9bebc2a3-106c-4b25-9db2-00e0031eb8f3
  2. 2Dataset: Damage assessments. vector, 2000 rows id f5a03720-aeb0-4ef8-aac1-6cee065b688a
  3. 3Dataset: Road status. vector, 160 rows id f3c7c4b5-fd2f-4d56-9b57-5acf7a4d0374
  4. 4Dataset: Relief distributions. vector, 320 rows id 27e9cd9e-cac7-4864-8dbe-27172247ad35
  5. 5Dataset: Ward needs by day. table, 420 rows id b8f0859d-75f2-425c-a636-bd120d62d172
  6. 6Document page: Situation report No. 4, page 1. 2026-09-14 id c492201b-e67e-4ae4-b97c-58a6ff283bc1:1
  7. 7Catalog: Hot spot analysis (operation catalog, gp_hot_spots). Getis-Ord Gi* hot and cold spots with z-scores, p-values and confidence bins. ArcGIS: Find Hot Spots, Hot Spot Analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*). QGIS: qgis:hotspot (plugin). id gp_hot_spots
  8. 8Plan: Hot spots of Relief distributions (the Start plan's candidate c_2bd4e1c1361d). 320 points: Getis-Ord Gi* tests whether the concentrations in Relief distributions are statistically significant. id 5a15d461-f147-4d9e-923e-64f1e88fcd39:c_2bd4e1c1361d
  9. 9Tool result: gp_hot_spots, step 0. Hot spot analysis: 1 layer saved: Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions (320 features). id 312e7d93-9021-497b-95d6-33778143cdfe:0
  10. 10Layer: Relief distributions. 320 features id 83cbe688-753d-41e3-963d-5ac6a237060b
  11. 11Plan: Hot spots of Water points (the Start plan's candidate c_0814d71ea2c0). 60 points: Getis-Ord Gi* tests whether the concentrations in Water points are statistically significant. id 5a15d461-f147-4d9e-923e-64f1e88fcd39:c_0814d71ea2c0
  12. 12Tool result: gp_hot_spots, step 1. Hot spot analysis: 1 layer saved: Hot spot analysis: Water points (20 features). id 312e7d93-9021-497b-95d6-33778143cdfe:1
  13. 13Layer: Water points. 60 features id 2a061d8c-77a7-4d5f-9dfd-426a08595f03
  14. 14Plan: Hot spots of Damage assessments (the Start plan's candidate c_5240b7fee4b7). 2000 points: Getis-Ord Gi* tests whether the concentrations in Damage assessments are statistically significant. id 5a15d461-f147-4d9e-923e-64f1e88fcd39:c_5240b7fee4b7
  15. 15Tool result: gp_hot_spots, step 2. Hot spot analysis: 1 layer saved: Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments (2000 features). id 312e7d93-9021-497b-95d6-33778143cdfe:2
  16. 16Layer: Damage assessments. 2,000 features id 26bd99f3-3f2e-40d8-9e45-68835e95f651
  17. 17Catalog: Emerging hot spots (operation catalog, gp_space_time_hot_spots). Where hot spots are new, consecutive, intensifying, persistent, diminishing, sporadic, oscillating or historical over time. ArcGIS: Emerging Hot Spot Analysis, Create Space Time Cube. id gp_space_time_hot_spots
  18. 18Plan: Space time hot spots of Relief distributions (the Start plan's candidate c_a90b274940ea). Relief distributions carry dates in 'date': emerging hot spot analysis finds new, intensifying and fading hot spots per day. id 5a15d461-f147-4d9e-923e-64f1e88fcd39:c_a90b274940ea
  19. 19Tool result: gp_space_time_hot_spots, step 0. Emerging hot spots: 1 layer saved: Emerging hot spots: Relief distributions (54 features). id 6a511518-66af-49c2-9961-06cf7330178d:0
  20. 20Plan: Space time hot spots of Damage assessments (the Start plan's candidate c_e9b3cd3966d9). Damage assessments carry dates in 'assessed_at': emerging hot spot analysis finds new, intensifying and fading hot spots per day. id 5a15d461-f147-4d9e-923e-64f1e88fcd39:c_e9b3cd3966d9
  21. 21Tool result: gp_space_time_hot_spots, step 1. Emerging hot spots: 1 layer saved: Emerging hot spots: Damage assessments (87 features). id 6a511518-66af-49c2-9961-06cf7330178d:1
  22. 22Catalog: Repeat and near repeat classification (operation catalog, gp_near_repeat). Classify incidents as originators, repeats (same place) or near repeats within a distance and time window, with a Knox test table. ArcGIS: Repeat and Near Repeat Classification, Near Repeat Calculator. id gp_near_repeat
  23. 23Plan: Near repeat of Relief distributions (the Start plan's candidate c_d2196a8324bf). Near repeat analysis tests whether Relief distributions close in space also follow each other within 3 days. id 5a15d461-f147-4d9e-923e-64f1e88fcd39:c_d2196a8324bf
  24. 24Tool result: gp_near_repeat, step 2. Repeat and near repeat classification: 1 layer saved: Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions (320 features). id 6a511518-66af-49c2-9961-06cf7330178d:2
  25. 25Catalog: Summarize within (operation catalog, gp_summarize_within). Count and aggregate the features inside each polygon (or bin), proportionally for lines and polygons. ArcGIS: Summarize Within, Aggregate Points. QGIS: native:countpointsinpolygon, native:sumlinelengths. id gp_summarize_within
  26. 26Plan: Shelters per feature of Wards (the Start plan's candidate c_51fb9e92bbf5). Count Shelters inside each feature of Wards by type; the counts map as a choropleth (natural breaks, sequential colors). id 5a15d461-f147-4d9e-923e-64f1e88fcd39:c_51fb9e92bbf5
  27. 27Tool result: gp_summarize_within, step 0. Summarize within: 1 layer saved: Summarize within: Wards (20 features). id 0979c79d-77b1-475d-a7be-e19a6678cb6f:0
  28. 28Layer: Shelters. 25 features id ee1b31b2-fece-4bec-a323-47ac9bdb3e6e
  29. 29Layer: Wards. 20 features id b338e26e-89d1-4de4-af0b-e9e1f797c2dd
  30. 30Tool result: gp_summarize_within, step 1. Summarize within: 1 layer saved: Summarize within: Wards (20 features). id 0979c79d-77b1-475d-a7be-e19a6678cb6f:1
  31. 31Tool result: gp_summarize_within, step 2. Summarize within: 1 layer saved: Summarize within: Wards (20 features). id 0979c79d-77b1-475d-a7be-e19a6678cb6f:2
  32. 32Layer: Health posts. 20 features id 7aed59a8-fdc9-4dca-9da9-530aea39fdf7
  33. 33Catalog: Find point clusters (operation catalog, gp_find_point_clusters). Density-based clusters (DBSCAN, HDBSCAN or OPTICS, optionally space-time) with hulls and noise. ArcGIS: Find Point Clusters, Density-based Clustering. QGIS: native:dbscanclustering, native:stdbscanclustering. id gp_find_point_clusters
  34. 34Plan: Cluster points of Shelters (the Start plan's candidate c_f692379d6a4c). DBSCAN finds dense groups of Shelters and separates noise. id 5a15d461-f147-4d9e-923e-64f1e88fcd39:c_f692379d6a4c
  35. 35Tool result: gp_find_point_clusters, step 0. Find point clusters: 2 layers saved: Find point clusters: Shelters (25 features); Find point clusters: cluster hulls (1 feature). id e8b434c3-b356-440a-9abe-58d49d66cc97:0
  36. 36Plan: Cluster points of Relief distributions (the Start plan's candidate c_349573557ecd). DBSCAN finds dense groups of Relief distributions and separates noise. id 5a15d461-f147-4d9e-923e-64f1e88fcd39:c_349573557ecd
  37. 37Tool result: gp_find_point_clusters, step 1. Find point clusters: 2 layers saved: Find point clusters: Relief distributions (320 features); Find point clusters: cluster hulls (21 features). id e8b434c3-b356-440a-9abe-58d49d66cc97:1
  38. 38Plan: Cluster points of Health posts (the Start plan's candidate c_ff423f0ff11e). DBSCAN finds dense groups of Health posts and separates noise. id 5a15d461-f147-4d9e-923e-64f1e88fcd39:c_ff423f0ff11e
  39. 39Tool result: gp_find_point_clusters, step 2. Find point clusters: 2 layers saved: Find point clusters: Health posts (20 features); Find point clusters: cluster hulls (2 features). id e8b434c3-b356-440a-9abe-58d49d66cc97:2
  40. 40Catalog: Calculate density (operation catalog, gp_calculate_density). Kernel density per square kilometer on a grid. ArcGIS: Calculate Density, Kernel Density. QGIS: native:heatmapkerneldensityestimation. id gp_calculate_density
  41. 41Plan: Kernel density of Shelters (the Start plan's candidate c_af35bc95bb98). 25 points in Shelters: a density surface shows where they concentrate. id 5a15d461-f147-4d9e-923e-64f1e88fcd39:c_af35bc95bb98
  42. 42Tool result: gp_calculate_density, step 0. Calculate density: 1 layer saved: Calculate density: Shelters (90 features). id dd271da2-1bea-419c-8888-9b686b947d5a:0
  43. 43Plan: Kernel density of Relief distributions (the Start plan's candidate c_346097776d28). 320 points in Relief distributions: a density surface shows where they concentrate. id 5a15d461-f147-4d9e-923e-64f1e88fcd39:c_346097776d28
  44. 44Tool result: gp_calculate_density, step 1. Calculate density: 1 layer saved: Calculate density: Relief distributions (222 features). id dd271da2-1bea-419c-8888-9b686b947d5a:1
  45. 45Plan: Kernel density of Health posts (the Start plan's candidate c_18ec87c25f18). 20 points in Health posts: a density surface shows where they concentrate. id 5a15d461-f147-4d9e-923e-64f1e88fcd39:c_18ec87c25f18
  46. 46Tool result: gp_calculate_density, step 2. Calculate density: 1 layer saved: Calculate density: Health posts (228 features). id dd271da2-1bea-419c-8888-9b686b947d5a:2
  47. 47Catalog: Find outliers (operation catalog, gp_outliers). Anselin local Moran’s I: HH, LL clusters and HL, LH outliers. ArcGIS: Find Outliers, Cluster and Outlier Analysis (Anselin Local Moran’s I). id gp_outliers
  48. 48Plan: Local morans i of Wards (the Start plan's candidate c_de4b9b365cb7). Local Moran's I maps clusters and outliers of 'population'. id 5a15d461-f147-4d9e-923e-64f1e88fcd39:c_de4b9b365cb7
  49. 49Tool result: gp_outliers, step 0. Find outliers: 1 layer saved: Find outliers: Wards (20 features). id 82ada6bc-afff-4238-9ffd-a1a3201c03ab:0
  50. 50Rendering: Map: Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions id 9390dd7d-eb52-4fef-b240-a9e39c60419a
  51. 51Rendering: Map: Hot spot analysis: Water points id c442f0af-9418-4ebb-bfcb-511695a7dfa4
  52. 52Rendering: Map: Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments id bf47cbcc-a7c2-4872-8e54-35d0ac4ff377
  53. 53Rendering: Map: Emerging hot spots: Relief distributions id 25f4f54c-4c45-48cf-a569-65f18477854c
  54. 54Rendering: Map: Emerging hot spots: Damage assessments id 6a4358fa-15b6-48b5-8954-acdaa394ce25
  55. 55Rendering: Map: Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions id 9939dbb6-e3f8-4379-ac14-09eaa503d896
  56. 56Rendering: Map: Summarize within: Wards id 7e37ed6c-8912-44a3-bf3e-ee68208d7033
  57. 57Rendering: Map: Summarize within: Wards id be38a33a-5f20-4c0b-8912-57fa7895a19e
  58. 58Rendering: Map: Summarize within: Wards id b5d154ed-f63d-4d53-9377-fa605622ef5a
  59. 59Rendering: Map: Find point clusters: Shelters id c9d2bd3b-593e-4289-8016-4c68db15e487
  60. 60Rendering: Map: Find point clusters: cluster hulls id 6a3bb4df-0c93-47d3-ac5d-799d9cc55d97
  61. 61Rendering: Map: Find point clusters: Relief distributions id 7e541131-6f4c-4bb1-b407-1446d58780c9
  62. 62Rendering: Map: Find point clusters: cluster hulls id 38f01879-759a-4a13-835c-d8b021e78321
  63. 63Rendering: Map: Find point clusters: Health posts id 3e2a4e84-8386-4533-beff-b52a92b8455a
  64. 64Rendering: Map: Find point clusters: cluster hulls id 2e4605ac-3908-4fc6-9ef3-f84a99eee64a
  65. 65Rendering: Map: Calculate density: Shelters id 4c369f35-f8c0-44c2-af51-a805408d3d2c
  66. 66Rendering: Map: Calculate density: Relief distributions id 1fe838e1-34dc-4443-9b06-a8e4dfca95b1
  67. 67Rendering: Map: Calculate density: Health posts id 757ffe50-e313-4da5-9be2-6dc7c3f38b2c
  68. 68Rendering: Map: Wards by population id 74dd8da4-312d-43c5-85e7-bb2fb6224f53
  69. 69Rendering: Map: Find outliers: Wards id 7bf81023-a30e-4346-ab12-ff2513b7947f
  70. 70Rendering: Chart: Water points over time (litres_per_day). 7 rows id be19f3c9-7c18-4737-8ac1-c4b65ed62211
  71. 71Rendering: Chart: Relief distributions over time (date). 76 rows id 2be61f8a-8348-49a8-8c78-1ea19f2626a3
  72. 72Rendering: Chart: Ward needs by day over time (date). 126 rows id 3683d15b-0f5f-4034-99d3-c60bbd06867c
  73. 73Rendering: Chart: Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions. 7 rows id 8a54330c-390f-456b-b3e3-6ba7256e4df3
  74. 74Rendering: Chart: Hot spot analysis: Water points. 7 rows id beea2a8b-78df-4622-919a-df7a4d7bf1a9
  75. 75Rendering: Chart: Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments. 30 rows id b6ec9de8-9bcf-49e9-ba5e-2e62a12c8ca5
  76. 76Rendering: Chart: Emerging hot spots: Relief distributions. 7 rows id bde631a0-88da-4ec0-881b-6dc66cb32acc
  77. 77Rendering: Chart: Emerging hot spots: Damage assessments. 8 rows id 5060f9d4-d1f0-4a03-b624-4e1aa484e60d
  78. 78Rendering: Chart: Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions. 76 rows id ad7da8c7-ed67-45e8-86ad-6f21ca29cbfd
  79. 79Rendering: Chart: Summarize within: Wards. 6 rows id eb5740e9-38f8-42ba-9d54-b9bec7d81080
  80. 80Rendering: Chart: Summarize within: Wards. 6 rows id 87ce8246-fadd-470c-b5a7-eb0629fc5ea3
  81. 81Rendering: Chart: Summarize within: Wards. 6 rows id 190869f4-a9ae-4fed-a451-67bc4560549c
  82. 82Rendering: Chart: Find point clusters: Shelters. 2 rows id 7be17c77-d4b9-4caf-8e86-10eb6d9d53e2
  83. 83Rendering: Chart: Find point clusters: cluster hulls. 1 rows id 382198e8-9ac9-4b75-9e8e-ef34700f25cd
  84. 84Rendering: Chart: Find point clusters: Relief distributions. 22 rows id bae50ece-0f0f-4399-87fd-3618eed224a5
  85. 85Rendering: Chart: Find point clusters: cluster hulls. 21 rows id 7bff01e1-9aeb-448c-8822-197f969c18f3
  86. 86Rendering: Chart: Find point clusters: Health posts. 3 rows id c1d4618b-97c3-444b-b7e7-445c2a95bc45
  87. 87Rendering: Chart: Find point clusters: cluster hulls. 2 rows id 004552ff-ca8c-4bd5-9838-b11d434b85b3
  88. 88Rendering: Chart: Calculate density: Shelters. 8 rows id 4716859b-53cb-4d5a-8441-47de226233ed
  89. 89Rendering: Chart: Calculate density: Relief distributions. 9 rows id a66c3a3a-0d79-4a90-8ba8-25684b82f78c
  90. 90Rendering: Chart: Calculate density: Health posts. 9 rows id 6d33660c-fb55-4ce5-9407-14cede82f1f7
  91. 91Rendering: Chart: Find outliers: Wards. 20 rows id 2c943aea-f0e1-4d2e-9a74-b1f3a68cccaf
  92. 92Rendering: Chart: Find point clusters: Relief distributions over time. 76 rows id ae09526f-b719-40fa-9352-7253703419e6
  93. 93Rendering: Chart: Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions over time. 76 rows id d25012cc-f981-414f-b270-f5188a23b23a
  94. 94Rendering: Chart: Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments over time. 126 rows id dddbf0f7-9186-4260-86f0-90b42b3a2b7c
  95. 95Rendering: Chart: Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions over time. 76 rows id 75a753b2-7ec0-435d-93af-df87c5a2fdf9
  96. 96Dataset: Wards. vector, 20 rows id cd24d135-3a85-486d-b85d-aad5c710434a
  97. 97Dataset: Shelters. vector, 25 rows id 1a4488fc-1d07-4261-9f0e-01b2b1f2dca2
  98. 98Dataset: Water points. vector, 60 rows id c5cb6996-b665-4741-91b9-eb2b235d60b3
  99. 99Dataset: Health posts. vector, 20 rows id 8e654bff-294d-4ad6-be89-593de050aebf
  100. 100Dataset: Shelter register. table, 25 rows id 71a97a94-2ec4-4a02-b6d8-66a6192053f9
  101. 101Dataset: Situation report No. 4. document, ? rows id 919b6864-e3dc-42c9-b9dc-71340dbf1f59
  102. 102Record: Sample: Disaster response, Kathmandu id affd1e20-248c-4f96-b09d-48d3027477be
  103. 103Layer: Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions. 320 features id 9e5f578c-630b-43eb-8ebe-8545f6fca7c2
  104. 104Layer: Hot spot analysis: Water points. 20 features id bb294769-aa54-4b53-b8ab-a11a9895ae52
  105. 105Layer: Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments. 2,000 features id 363b8c44-c958-4210-beb4-e032340f3591
  106. 106Layer: Emerging hot spots: Relief distributions. 54 features id 6f8363b7-e1a7-432e-b17e-f0e1a5b04c12
  107. 107Layer: Emerging hot spots: Damage assessments. 87 features id 26abf030-7544-4caa-a068-87e5fbf6fc76
  108. 108Layer: Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions. 320 features id 176d38bd-d5dd-4e59-bcf4-f4f67c442f05
  109. 109Layer: Summarize within: Wards. 20 features id 59ed06c8-19f7-4cdc-bf0a-93f1af3df0bb
  110. 110Layer: Summarize within: Wards. 20 features id 60eb7f4c-9283-4a68-b158-7fe6014e035b
  111. 111Layer: Summarize within: Wards. 20 features id d2a68fd2-e432-4366-8c8c-79cfc7fbd916
  112. 112Layer: Find point clusters: Shelters. 25 features id db7ac08f-e31a-41c7-b06d-b7bc5b1ddae1
  113. 113Layer: Find point clusters: cluster hulls. 1 features id 1a61db01-7dbf-4a4b-a14e-619c2d2130e2
  114. 114Layer: Find point clusters: Relief distributions. 320 features id 80a3b728-2f6b-44e4-962f-eac228b32051
  115. 115Layer: Find point clusters: cluster hulls. 21 features id ab1e3ae7-0d91-4e6a-8a58-5afda7d572e8
  116. 116Layer: Find point clusters: Health posts. 20 features id f387abca-2c2c-4945-9f86-d310b94a5d2e
  117. 117Layer: Find point clusters: cluster hulls. 2 features id 0ee12d31-db24-4ae2-ba77-bea3bd72c010
  118. 118Layer: Calculate density: Shelters. 90 features id 70bc6150-3af3-4110-ba8a-60400c37bf40
  119. 119Layer: Calculate density: Relief distributions. 222 features id 3d315b62-8343-4e06-9cb9-c92f6b2c53e0
  120. 120Layer: Calculate density: Health posts. 228 features id dc129652-f329-497f-8a85-b1a55c7c00b4
  121. 121Document: Situation report No. 4 id c492201b-e67e-4ae4-b97c-58a6ff283bc1
  122. 122Layer: Find outliers: Wards. 20 features id a6dabb92-ab09-424d-95b6-28b66295aba0
Appendix: the data behind the chartsShow

Figure 1. Timeline: events per day by dataset 1

periodseriesvalue
2026-09-02Damage assessments135
2026-09-02Ward needs by day20
2026-09-02Relief distributions0
2026-09-02Road status0
2026-09-03Damage assessments132
2026-09-03Ward needs by day20
2026-09-03Relief distributions0
2026-09-03Road status12
2026-09-04Damage assessments120
2026-09-04Ward needs by day20
2026-09-04Relief distributions21
2026-09-04Road status9
2026-09-05Damage assessments138
2026-09-05Ward needs by day20
2026-09-05Relief distributions15
2026-09-05Road status8
2026-09-06Damage assessments104
2026-09-06Ward needs by day20
2026-09-06Relief distributions15
2026-09-06Road status13
2026-09-07Damage assessments95
2026-09-07Ward needs by day20
2026-09-07Relief distributions9
2026-09-07Road status13
2026-09-08Damage assessments109
2026-09-08Ward needs by day20
2026-09-08Relief distributions18
2026-09-08Road status12
2026-09-09Damage assessments115
2026-09-09Ward needs by day20
2026-09-09Relief distributions16
2026-09-09Road status8
2026-09-10Damage assessments116
2026-09-10Ward needs by day20
2026-09-10Relief distributions15
2026-09-10Road status3
2026-09-11Damage assessments108
2026-09-11Ward needs by day20
2026-09-11Relief distributions15
2026-09-11Road status12
2026-09-12Damage assessments94
2026-09-12Ward needs by day20
2026-09-12Relief distributions17
2026-09-12Road status6
2026-09-13Damage assessments78
2026-09-13Ward needs by day20
2026-09-13Relief distributions19
2026-09-13Road status9
2026-09-14Damage assessments79
2026-09-14Ward needs by day20
2026-09-14Relief distributions17
2026-09-14Road status12
2026-09-15Damage assessments89
2026-09-15Ward needs by day20
2026-09-15Relief distributions19
2026-09-15Road status9
2026-09-16Damage assessments76
2026-09-16Ward needs by day20
2026-09-16Relief distributions18
2026-09-16Road status9
2026-09-17Damage assessments89
2026-09-17Ward needs by day20
2026-09-17Relief distributions20
2026-09-17Road status7
2026-09-18Damage assessments69
2026-09-18Ward needs by day20
2026-09-18Relief distributions17
2026-09-18Road status6
2026-09-19Damage assessments75
2026-09-19Ward needs by day20
2026-09-19Relief distributions11
2026-09-19Road status7
2026-09-20Damage assessments63
2026-09-20Ward needs by day20
2026-09-20Relief distributions16
2026-09-20Road status5
2026-09-21Damage assessments58
2026-09-21Ward needs by day20
2026-09-21Relief distributions18
2026-09-21Road status0
2026-09-22Damage assessments58
2026-09-22Ward needs by day20
2026-09-22Relief distributions24
2026-09-22Road status0

Figure 22. Water points over time (litres_per_day) 70

bin_startbin_endcount
3,3069,00515
9,0051.47e+0421
1.47e+042.04e+0414
2.04e+042.61e+045
2.61e+043.18e+043
3.18e+043.75e+041
3.75e+044.32e+041

Figure 23. Relief distributions over time (date) 71

periodseriesvalue
2026-09-04tarpaulin900
2026-09-04blanket956
2026-09-04food kit1,490
2026-09-04hygiene kit1,373
2026-09-05tarpaulin509
2026-09-05blanket843
2026-09-05food kit928
2026-09-05hygiene kit519
2026-09-06tarpaulin970
2026-09-06blanket665
2026-09-06food kit474
2026-09-06hygiene kit285
2026-09-07tarpaulin0
2026-09-07blanket1,088
2026-09-07food kit381
2026-09-07hygiene kit391
2026-09-08tarpaulin1,716
2026-09-08blanket322
2026-09-08food kit1,480
2026-09-08hygiene kit913
2026-09-09tarpaulin772
2026-09-09blanket1,101
2026-09-09food kit1,175
2026-09-09hygiene kit591
2026-09-10tarpaulin1,161
2026-09-10blanket777
2026-09-10food kit509
2026-09-10hygiene kit409
2026-09-11tarpaulin120
2026-09-11blanket668
2026-09-11food kit612
2026-09-11hygiene kit896
2026-09-12tarpaulin579
2026-09-12blanket1,064
2026-09-12food kit229
2026-09-12hygiene kit1,670
2026-09-13tarpaulin652
2026-09-13blanket1,803
2026-09-13food kit830
2026-09-13hygiene kit290
2026-09-14tarpaulin477
2026-09-14blanket1,465
2026-09-14food kit1,109
2026-09-14hygiene kit713
2026-09-15tarpaulin2,002
2026-09-15blanket954
2026-09-15food kit900
2026-09-15hygiene kit276
2026-09-16tarpaulin1,140
2026-09-16blanket678
2026-09-16food kit1,279
2026-09-16hygiene kit1,119
2026-09-17tarpaulin989
2026-09-17blanket837
2026-09-17food kit612
2026-09-17hygiene kit851
2026-09-18tarpaulin1,746
2026-09-18blanket528
2026-09-18food kit572
2026-09-18hygiene kit1,245
2026-09-19tarpaulin681
2026-09-19blanket574
2026-09-19food kit851
2026-09-19hygiene kit408
2026-09-20tarpaulin1,323
2026-09-20blanket1,162
2026-09-20food kit418
2026-09-20hygiene kit680
2026-09-21tarpaulin1,866
2026-09-21blanket1,343
2026-09-21food kit481
2026-09-21hygiene kit746
2026-09-22tarpaulin538
2026-09-22blanket891
2026-09-22food kit1,749
2026-09-22hygiene kit1,689

Figure 24. Ward needs by day over time (date) 72

periodseriesvalue
2026-09-02W061,174
2026-09-02W18738
2026-09-02W20705
2026-09-02W04501
2026-09-02W05480
2026-09-02Other3,667
2026-09-03W061,146
2026-09-03W18720
2026-09-03W20688
2026-09-03W04489
2026-09-03W05468
2026-09-03Other3,581
2026-09-04W061,118
2026-09-04W18703
2026-09-04W20672
2026-09-04W04477
2026-09-04W05457
2026-09-04Other3,492
2026-09-05W061,090
2026-09-05W18685
2026-09-05W20655
2026-09-05W04465
2026-09-05W05445
2026-09-05Other3,405
2026-09-06W061,062
2026-09-06W18667
2026-09-06W20638
2026-09-06W04453
2026-09-06W05434
2026-09-06Other3,318
2026-09-07W061,034
2026-09-07W18650
2026-09-07W20621
2026-09-07W04441
2026-09-07W05422
2026-09-07Other3,230
2026-09-08W061,006
2026-09-08W18632
2026-09-08W20604
2026-09-08W04429
2026-09-08W05411
2026-09-08Other3,143
2026-09-09W06978
2026-09-09W18615
2026-09-09W20588
2026-09-09W04417
2026-09-09W05400
2026-09-09Other3,055
2026-09-10W06950
2026-09-10W18597
2026-09-10W20571
2026-09-10W04405
2026-09-10W05388
2026-09-10Other2,968
2026-09-11W06922
2026-09-11W18580
2026-09-11W20554
2026-09-11W04393
2026-09-11W05377
2026-09-11Other2,880
2026-09-12W06894
2026-09-12W18562
2026-09-12W20537
2026-09-12W04381
2026-09-12W05365
2026-09-12Other2,792
2026-09-13W06866
2026-09-13W18544
2026-09-13W20520
2026-09-13W04370
2026-09-13W05354
2026-09-13Other2,705
2026-09-14W06838
2026-09-14W18527
2026-09-14W20504
2026-09-14W04358
2026-09-14W05342
2026-09-14Other2,616
2026-09-15W06811
2026-09-15W18509
2026-09-15W20487
2026-09-15W04346
2026-09-15W05331
2026-09-15Other2,530
2026-09-16W06783
2026-09-16W18492
2026-09-16W20470
2026-09-16W04334
2026-09-16W05320
2026-09-16Other2,442
2026-09-17W06755
2026-09-17W18474
2026-09-17W20453
2026-09-17W04322
2026-09-17W05308
2026-09-17Other2,355
2026-09-18W06727
2026-09-18W18457
2026-09-18W20436
2026-09-18W04310
2026-09-18W05297
2026-09-18Other2,270
2026-09-19W06699
2026-09-19W18439
2026-09-19W20420
2026-09-19W04298
2026-09-19W05285
2026-09-19Other2,180
2026-09-20W06671
2026-09-20W18421
2026-09-20W20403
2026-09-20W04286
2026-09-20W05274
2026-09-20Other2,093
2026-09-21W06643
2026-09-21W18404
2026-09-21W20386
2026-09-21W04274
2026-09-21W05262
2026-09-21Other2,006
2026-09-22W06615
2026-09-22W18386
2026-09-22W20369
2026-09-22W04262
2026-09-22W05251
2026-09-22Other1,918

Figure 25. Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions 73

bin_startbin_endbandband_labelcount
-2-1.5cold_90Cold spot, 90% confidence4
-1.5-1not_significantNot significant49
-1-0.5not_significantNot significant47
-0.50not_significantNot significant24
00.5not_significantNot significant111
0.51not_significantNot significant72
11.5not_significantNot significant13

Figure 26. Hot spot analysis: Water points 74

bin_startbin_endbandband_labelcount
-2-1.5cold_90Cold spot, 90% confidence2
-1.5-1not_significantNot significant1
-1-0.5not_significantNot significant5
00.5not_significantNot significant5
0.51not_significantNot significant3
11.5not_significantNot significant3
22.5hot_95Hot spot, 95% confidence1

Figure 27. Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments 75

bin_startbin_endbandband_labelcount
-4.5-4cold_99Cold spot, 99% confidence3
-4-3.5cold_99Cold spot, 99% confidence22
-3.5-3cold_99Cold spot, 99% confidence54
-3-2.5cold_95Cold spot, 95% confidence8
-3-2.5cold_99Cold spot, 99% confidence111
-2.5-2cold_95Cold spot, 95% confidence149
-2-1.5cold_90Cold spot, 90% confidence99
-2-1.5cold_95Cold spot, 95% confidence6
-2-1.5not_significantNot significant38
-1.5-1not_significantNot significant161
-1-0.5not_significantNot significant88
-0.50not_significantNot significant102
00.5not_significantNot significant91
0.51not_significantNot significant104
11.5not_significantNot significant139
1.52hot_90Hot spot, 90% confidence104
1.52hot_95Hot spot, 95% confidence7
1.52not_significantNot significant35
22.5hot_95Hot spot, 95% confidence109
2.53hot_95Hot spot, 95% confidence12
2.53hot_99Hot spot, 99% confidence87
33.5hot_99Hot spot, 99% confidence105
3.54hot_99Hot spot, 99% confidence73
44.5hot_99Hot spot, 99% confidence60
4.55hot_99Hot spot, 99% confidence49
55.5hot_99Hot spot, 99% confidence38
5.56hot_99Hot spot, 99% confidence64
66.5hot_99Hot spot, 99% confidence57
6.57hot_99Hot spot, 99% confidence23
77.5hot_99Hot spot, 99% confidence2

Figure 28. Emerging hot spots: Relief distributions 76

bin_startbin_endcount
-0.827-0.216715
-0.21670.393611
0.39361.00410
1.0041.6146
1.6142.2246
2.2242.8354
2.8353.4452

Figure 29. Emerging hot spots: Damage assessments 77

bin_startbin_endcount
-1.153-0.566445
-0.56640.0202518
0.020250.606910
0.60691.1940
1.1941.786
1.782.3676
2.3672.9531
2.9533.541

Figure 30. Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions 78

periodseriesvalue
2026-09-04blanket5
2026-09-04tarpaulin4
2026-09-04hygiene kit6
2026-09-04food kit6
2026-09-05blanket4
2026-09-05tarpaulin2
2026-09-05hygiene kit3
2026-09-05food kit6
2026-09-06blanket4
2026-09-06tarpaulin5
2026-09-06hygiene kit4
2026-09-06food kit2
2026-09-07blanket5
2026-09-07tarpaulin0
2026-09-07hygiene kit1
2026-09-07food kit3
2026-09-08blanket1
2026-09-08tarpaulin8
2026-09-08hygiene kit4
2026-09-08food kit5
2026-09-09blanket4
2026-09-09tarpaulin5
2026-09-09hygiene kit3
2026-09-09food kit4
2026-09-10blanket4
2026-09-10tarpaulin6
2026-09-10hygiene kit2
2026-09-10food kit3
2026-09-11blanket5
2026-09-11tarpaulin1
2026-09-11hygiene kit6
2026-09-11food kit3
2026-09-12blanket4
2026-09-12tarpaulin3
2026-09-12hygiene kit8
2026-09-12food kit2
2026-09-13blanket8
2026-09-13tarpaulin5
2026-09-13hygiene kit2
2026-09-13food kit4
2026-09-14blanket7
2026-09-14tarpaulin3
2026-09-14hygiene kit4
2026-09-14food kit3
2026-09-15blanket5
2026-09-15tarpaulin8
2026-09-15hygiene kit2
2026-09-15food kit4
2026-09-16blanket4
2026-09-16tarpaulin5
2026-09-16hygiene kit5
2026-09-16food kit4
2026-09-17blanket6
2026-09-17tarpaulin5
2026-09-17hygiene kit5
2026-09-17food kit4
2026-09-18blanket2
2026-09-18tarpaulin6
2026-09-18hygiene kit6
2026-09-18food kit3
2026-09-19blanket4
2026-09-19tarpaulin2
2026-09-19hygiene kit2
2026-09-19food kit3
2026-09-20blanket5
2026-09-20tarpaulin6
2026-09-20hygiene kit3
2026-09-20food kit2
2026-09-21blanket4
2026-09-21tarpaulin8
2026-09-21hygiene kit2
2026-09-21food kit4
2026-09-22blanket6
2026-09-22tarpaulin3
2026-09-22hygiene kit9
2026-09-22food kit6

Figure 31. Summarize within: Wards 79

bin_startbin_endcount
00.53
0.510
11.511
1.520
22.54
2.532

Figure 32. Summarize within: Wards 80

bin_startbin_endcount
074
7143
14217
21282
28352
35422

Figure 33. Summarize within: Wards 81

bin_startbin_endcount
00.66679
0.66671.3336
1.33320
22.6672
2.6673.3332
3.33341

Figure 34. Find point clusters: Shelters 82

clusterfeaturesfractionshare
0230.9292.0%
Noise20.088.0%

Figure 35. Find point clusters: cluster hulls 83

clusterfeaturesfractionshare
011100.0%

Figure 36. Find point clusters: Relief distributions 84

clusterfeaturesfractionshare
7250.078127.8%
15210.065636.6%
0170.053125.3%
10170.053125.3%
2170.053125.3%
9160.055.0%
11150.046884.7%
12150.046884.7%
3150.046884.7%
14140.043754.4%
17140.043754.4%
4140.043754.4%
5140.043754.4%
6140.043754.4%
8140.043754.4%
18130.040634.1%
13120.03753.8%
20120.03753.8%
Noise120.03753.8%
19110.034383.4%
1100.031253.1%
1680.0252.5%

Figure 37. Find point clusters: cluster hulls 85

clusterfeaturesfractionshare
010.047624.8%
110.047624.8%
1010.047624.8%
1110.047624.8%
1210.047624.8%
1310.047624.8%
1410.047624.8%
1510.047624.8%
1610.047624.8%
1710.047624.8%
1810.047624.8%
1910.047624.8%
210.047624.8%
2010.047624.8%
310.047624.8%
410.047624.8%
510.047624.8%
610.047624.8%
710.047624.8%
810.047624.8%
910.047624.8%

Figure 38. Find point clusters: Health posts 86

clusterfeaturesfractionshare
0160.880.0%
130.1515.0%
Noise10.055.0%

Figure 39. Find point clusters: cluster hulls 87

clusterfeaturesfractionshare
010.550.0%
110.550.0%

Figure 40. Calculate density: Shelters 88

bin_startbin_endcount
4.952e-050.104626
0.10460.209111
0.20910.313713
0.31370.418216
0.41820.522713
0.52270.62736
0.62730.73184
0.73180.83641

Figure 41. Calculate density: Relief distributions 89

bin_startbin_endcount
0216
2424
4630
6830
81029
101223
121430
141627
161813

Figure 42. Calculate density: Health posts 90

bin_startbin_endcount
01.77819
1.7783.55628
3.5565.33332
5.3337.11132
7.1118.88915
8.88910.6732
10.6712.4432
12.4414.2226
14.221612

Figure 43. Find outliers: Wards 91

valuelagtype
-0.10060.265NS
-1.513-0.6592NS
-0.5809-0.8478NS
-0.3709-0.6076NS
-0.0457-1.258NS
2.151-1.039NS
-0.09250.0756NS
-1.0040.3063NS
0.11571.873NS
0.9009-0.1006NS
-0.5907-0.6902NS
1.234-1.004NS
1.873-0.0841NS
0.7456-0.5907NS
-0.28380.3999NS
-1.413-0.7775NS
0.4349-0.0925NS
-0.9643-0.4722NS
0.6182-1.004NS
-1.115-0.1741NS

Figure 44. Find point clusters: Relief distributions over time 92

periodseriesvalue
2026-09-04blanket5
2026-09-04tarpaulin4
2026-09-04hygiene kit6
2026-09-04food kit6
2026-09-05blanket4
2026-09-05tarpaulin2
2026-09-05hygiene kit3
2026-09-05food kit6
2026-09-06blanket4
2026-09-06tarpaulin5
2026-09-06hygiene kit4
2026-09-06food kit2
2026-09-07blanket5
2026-09-07tarpaulin0
2026-09-07hygiene kit1
2026-09-07food kit3
2026-09-08blanket1
2026-09-08tarpaulin8
2026-09-08hygiene kit4
2026-09-08food kit5
2026-09-09blanket4
2026-09-09tarpaulin5
2026-09-09hygiene kit3
2026-09-09food kit4
2026-09-10blanket4
2026-09-10tarpaulin6
2026-09-10hygiene kit2
2026-09-10food kit3
2026-09-11blanket5
2026-09-11tarpaulin1
2026-09-11hygiene kit6
2026-09-11food kit3
2026-09-12blanket4
2026-09-12tarpaulin3
2026-09-12hygiene kit8
2026-09-12food kit2
2026-09-13blanket8
2026-09-13tarpaulin5
2026-09-13hygiene kit2
2026-09-13food kit4
2026-09-14blanket7
2026-09-14tarpaulin3
2026-09-14hygiene kit4
2026-09-14food kit3
2026-09-15blanket5
2026-09-15tarpaulin8
2026-09-15hygiene kit2
2026-09-15food kit4
2026-09-16blanket4
2026-09-16tarpaulin5
2026-09-16hygiene kit5
2026-09-16food kit4
2026-09-17blanket6
2026-09-17tarpaulin5
2026-09-17hygiene kit5
2026-09-17food kit4
2026-09-18blanket2
2026-09-18tarpaulin6
2026-09-18hygiene kit6
2026-09-18food kit3
2026-09-19blanket4
2026-09-19tarpaulin2
2026-09-19hygiene kit2
2026-09-19food kit3
2026-09-20blanket5
2026-09-20tarpaulin6
2026-09-20hygiene kit3
2026-09-20food kit2
2026-09-21blanket4
2026-09-21tarpaulin8
2026-09-21hygiene kit2
2026-09-21food kit4
2026-09-22blanket6
2026-09-22tarpaulin3
2026-09-22hygiene kit9
2026-09-22food kit6

Figure 45. Repeat and near repeat classification: Relief distributions over time 93

periodseriesvalue
2026-09-04blanket5
2026-09-04tarpaulin4
2026-09-04hygiene kit6
2026-09-04food kit6
2026-09-05blanket4
2026-09-05tarpaulin2
2026-09-05hygiene kit3
2026-09-05food kit6
2026-09-06blanket4
2026-09-06tarpaulin5
2026-09-06hygiene kit4
2026-09-06food kit2
2026-09-07blanket5
2026-09-07tarpaulin0
2026-09-07hygiene kit1
2026-09-07food kit3
2026-09-08blanket1
2026-09-08tarpaulin8
2026-09-08hygiene kit4
2026-09-08food kit5
2026-09-09blanket4
2026-09-09tarpaulin5
2026-09-09hygiene kit3
2026-09-09food kit4
2026-09-10blanket4
2026-09-10tarpaulin6
2026-09-10hygiene kit2
2026-09-10food kit3
2026-09-11blanket5
2026-09-11tarpaulin1
2026-09-11hygiene kit6
2026-09-11food kit3
2026-09-12blanket4
2026-09-12tarpaulin3
2026-09-12hygiene kit8
2026-09-12food kit2
2026-09-13blanket8
2026-09-13tarpaulin5
2026-09-13hygiene kit2
2026-09-13food kit4
2026-09-14blanket7
2026-09-14tarpaulin3
2026-09-14hygiene kit4
2026-09-14food kit3
2026-09-15blanket5
2026-09-15tarpaulin8
2026-09-15hygiene kit2
2026-09-15food kit4
2026-09-16blanket4
2026-09-16tarpaulin5
2026-09-16hygiene kit5
2026-09-16food kit4
2026-09-17blanket6
2026-09-17tarpaulin5
2026-09-17hygiene kit5
2026-09-17food kit4
2026-09-18blanket2
2026-09-18tarpaulin6
2026-09-18hygiene kit6
2026-09-18food kit3
2026-09-19blanket4
2026-09-19tarpaulin2
2026-09-19hygiene kit2
2026-09-19food kit3
2026-09-20blanket5
2026-09-20tarpaulin6
2026-09-20hygiene kit3
2026-09-20food kit2
2026-09-21blanket4
2026-09-21tarpaulin8
2026-09-21hygiene kit2
2026-09-21food kit4
2026-09-22blanket6
2026-09-22tarpaulin3
2026-09-22hygiene kit9
2026-09-22food kit6

Figure 46. Hot spot analysis: Damage assessments over time 94

periodseriesvalue
2026-09-02not_significant51
2026-09-02hot_9941
2026-09-02cold_9912
2026-09-02cold_9513
2026-09-02hot_958
2026-09-02Other10
2026-09-03not_significant47
2026-09-03hot_9935
2026-09-03cold_999
2026-09-03cold_9514
2026-09-03hot_9511
2026-09-03Other16
2026-09-04not_significant47
2026-09-04hot_9937
2026-09-04cold_999
2026-09-04cold_958
2026-09-04hot_955
2026-09-04Other14
2026-09-05not_significant51
2026-09-05hot_9949
2026-09-05cold_9913
2026-09-05cold_957
2026-09-05hot_957
2026-09-05Other11
2026-09-06not_significant43
2026-09-06hot_9932
2026-09-06cold_997
2026-09-06cold_9510
2026-09-06hot_957
2026-09-06Other5
2026-09-07not_significant41
2026-09-07hot_9926
2026-09-07cold_996
2026-09-07cold_956
2026-09-07hot_958
2026-09-07Other8
2026-09-08not_significant41
2026-09-08hot_9929
2026-09-08cold_9910
2026-09-08cold_9510
2026-09-08hot_959
2026-09-08Other10
2026-09-09not_significant50
2026-09-09hot_9924
2026-09-09cold_9912
2026-09-09cold_9510
2026-09-09hot_957
2026-09-09Other12
2026-09-10not_significant38
2026-09-10hot_9938
2026-09-10cold_9914
2026-09-10cold_955
2026-09-10hot_958
2026-09-10Other13
2026-09-11not_significant35
2026-09-11hot_9924
2026-09-11cold_9911
2026-09-11cold_9514
2026-09-11hot_9513
2026-09-11Other11
2026-09-12not_significant36
2026-09-12hot_9927
2026-09-12cold_996
2026-09-12cold_957
2026-09-12hot_954
2026-09-12Other14
2026-09-13not_significant29
2026-09-13hot_9929
2026-09-13cold_994
2026-09-13cold_955
2026-09-13hot_954
2026-09-13Other7
2026-09-14not_significant33
2026-09-14hot_9914
2026-09-14cold_998
2026-09-14cold_959
2026-09-14hot_954
2026-09-14Other11
2026-09-15not_significant28
2026-09-15hot_9922
2026-09-15cold_9913
2026-09-15cold_959
2026-09-15hot_955
2026-09-15Other12
2026-09-16not_significant31
2026-09-16hot_9920
2026-09-16cold_998
2026-09-16cold_957
2026-09-16hot_953
2026-09-16Other7
2026-09-17not_significant30
2026-09-17hot_9932
2026-09-17cold_9913
2026-09-17cold_952
2026-09-17hot_953
2026-09-17Other9
2026-09-18not_significant23
2026-09-18hot_9920
2026-09-18cold_999
2026-09-18cold_956
2026-09-18hot_954
2026-09-18Other7
2026-09-19not_significant32
2026-09-19hot_9918
2026-09-19cold_996
2026-09-19cold_956
2026-09-19hot_956
2026-09-19Other7
2026-09-20not_significant24
2026-09-20hot_997
2026-09-20cold_9910
2026-09-20cold_957
2026-09-20hot_956
2026-09-20Other9
2026-09-21not_significant22
2026-09-21hot_9916
2026-09-21cold_995
2026-09-21cold_954
2026-09-21hot_954
2026-09-21Other7
2026-09-22not_significant26
2026-09-22hot_9918
2026-09-22cold_995
2026-09-22cold_954
2026-09-22hot_952
2026-09-22Other3

Figure 47. Hot spot analysis: Relief distributions over time 95

periodseriesvalue
2026-09-04blanket5
2026-09-04tarpaulin4
2026-09-04hygiene kit6
2026-09-04food kit6
2026-09-05blanket4
2026-09-05tarpaulin2
2026-09-05hygiene kit3
2026-09-05food kit6
2026-09-06blanket4
2026-09-06tarpaulin5
2026-09-06hygiene kit4
2026-09-06food kit2
2026-09-07blanket5
2026-09-07tarpaulin0
2026-09-07hygiene kit1
2026-09-07food kit3
2026-09-08blanket1
2026-09-08tarpaulin8
2026-09-08hygiene kit4
2026-09-08food kit5
2026-09-09blanket4
2026-09-09tarpaulin5
2026-09-09hygiene kit3
2026-09-09food kit4
2026-09-10blanket4
2026-09-10tarpaulin6
2026-09-10hygiene kit2
2026-09-10food kit3
2026-09-11blanket5
2026-09-11tarpaulin1
2026-09-11hygiene kit6
2026-09-11food kit3
2026-09-12blanket4
2026-09-12tarpaulin3
2026-09-12hygiene kit8
2026-09-12food kit2
2026-09-13blanket8
2026-09-13tarpaulin5
2026-09-13hygiene kit2
2026-09-13food kit4
2026-09-14blanket7
2026-09-14tarpaulin3
2026-09-14hygiene kit4
2026-09-14food kit3
2026-09-15blanket5
2026-09-15tarpaulin8
2026-09-15hygiene kit2
2026-09-15food kit4
2026-09-16blanket4
2026-09-16tarpaulin5
2026-09-16hygiene kit5
2026-09-16food kit4
2026-09-17blanket6
2026-09-17tarpaulin5
2026-09-17hygiene kit5
2026-09-17food kit4
2026-09-18blanket2
2026-09-18tarpaulin6
2026-09-18hygiene kit6
2026-09-18food kit3
2026-09-19blanket4
2026-09-19tarpaulin2
2026-09-19hygiene kit2
2026-09-19food kit3
2026-09-20blanket5
2026-09-20tarpaulin6
2026-09-20hygiene kit3
2026-09-20food kit2
2026-09-21blanket4
2026-09-21tarpaulin8
2026-09-21hygiene kit2
2026-09-21food kit4
2026-09-22blanket6
2026-09-22tarpaulin3
2026-09-22hygiene kit9
2026-09-22food kit6

GeoBit Large Spatial Model. Findings are labeled Evidenced (computed by a tool), Inferred (a reading or reasoning) or Unverified (no evidence yet).

The data

The files this sample uploads: synthetic data generated at a real place. Download any of them and add them to a project of your own.

DatasetKindRowsTime spanFile
Wards
Municipal wards with population.
vector, Polygon20wards.geojson
Damage assessments
Building damage assessments (grade 1 slight to 5 collapse) after the earthquake. Dated by assessed_at (minute).
vector, Point2,0002026-09-02
to 2026-09-22
damage_assessments.geojson
Shelters
Shelters and open spaces in use.
vector, Point25shelters.geojson
Road statusvector, LineString1602026-09-03
to 2026-09-20
road_status.geojson (not in the current sample data files)
Water points
Emergency water points.
vector, Point60water_points.geojson
Health posts
Health posts and whether they work.
vector, Point20health_posts.geojson
Relief distributions
Distributions of relief items by day. Dated by date (day).
vector, Point3202026-09-04
to 2026-09-22
relief_distributions.geojson
Ward needs by day
Daily needs reported per ward (joins to Wards on ward_code). Dated by date (day).
table4202026-09-02
to 2026-09-22
ward_needs_daily.csv
Shelter register
Capacity and occupants per shelter (joins to Shelters on shelter_id).
table25shelter_register.csv
Situation report No. 4
A situation report naming wards and shelters.
documentsituation_report.pdf, situation_report.md

What the data was built to show

  • Damage grade 4 and 5 buildings cluster on soft ground near 27.68758, 85.33803 (Ward 20 Upton Vale).
  • Shelters are scarce near the worst damage (coverage gap); roads there are blocked.
  • Assessments taper off over the three weeks; needs fall slowly.

Expected analysis families: hot_spots, aggregation, space_time, density, clusters.

How the product read each dataset

The profile written when the data was added, before Start; no model call is needed for it.

  • Wards: 20 polygon (area) features; 'population' 26,870 to 97,681 (mean 5.61e+04); 'households' 6,248 to 22,716 (mean 1.305e+04); named by 'name' (e.g. Ward 1 Oakwood, Ward 2 Ashby Green, Ward 3 Cedar Vale); total area 56.01 km2; extent 85.2789,27.6679 to 85.3610,27.7321.
  • Damage assessments: 2,000 point features; dated by 'assessed_at' from 2026-09-02 to 2026-09-22; 'occupancy' has 4 values (top: residential 792, commercial 425, school 397); 'construction' has 3 values (top: RC frame 680, brick in mud 671, brick in cement 649); 'damage_grade' 1 to 5 (mean 2.374); 'storeys' 1 to 5 (mean 2.846); 'people_displaced' 0 to 14 (mean 3.328); extent 85.2803,27.6689 to 85.3599,27.7310.
  • Shelters: 25 point features; 'type' has 3 values (top: open space 10, school 9, tent camp 6); 'capacity' 150 to 1,200 (mean 716); named by 'name' (e.g. Elmstead open space shelter, Hawthorn Rise open space shelter, Kingsmead open space shelter); extent 85.2832,27.6721 to 85.3569,27.7277.
  • Road status: 160 line features; dated by 'updated_on' from 2026-09-03 to 2026-09-20; 'status' has 3 values (top: open 122, restricted 21, blocked 17); 'cause' has 1 values (top: debris 38); named by 'name' (e.g. Tol Path, Bagh Path, Pul Path); total length 26.39 km; extent 85.2805,27.6687 to 85.3596,27.7311.
  • Water points: 60 point features; 'type' has 3 values (top: well 27, tap stand 17, tanker point 16); 'working' has 2 values (top: True 48, False 12); 'litres_per_day' 3,306 to 43,201 (mean 1.409e+04); extent 85.2811,27.6709 to 85.3594,27.7290.
  • Health posts: 20 point features; 'functional' has 2 values (top: True 14, False 6); 'beds' 5 to 25 (mean 14.7); named by 'name' (e.g. Health post Ashby Green, Health post Cedar Vale, Health post Elmstead); extent 85.2869,27.6701 to 85.3532,27.7259.
  • Relief distributions: 320 point features; dated by 'date' from 2026-09-04 to 2026-09-22; 'item' has 4 values (top: blanket 87, tarpaulin 85, hygiene kit 77); 'agency' has 3 values (top: relief society 109, municipality 108, NGO partner 103); 'households_served' 21 to 400 (mean 209.4); extent 85.2828,27.6718 to 85.3572,27.7279.
  • Ward needs by day: Table of 420 rows and 5 columns without geometry; dated by 'date' from 2026-09-02 to 2026-09-22; 'ward_code' has 20 values (top: W01 21, W02 21, W03 21); 'households_need_shelter' 62 to 1,174 (mean 276.6); 'water_l_per_person' 11 to 32 (mean 21.77); 'food_kits_needed' 51 to 503 (mean 155.4).
  • Shelter register: Table of 25 rows and 5 columns without geometry; 'managed_by' has 3 values (top: NGO 11, municipality 8, army 6); 'capacity' 150 to 1,200 (mean 716); 'occupants' 98 to 1,663 (mean 808.5); 'toilets' 4 to 30 (mean 18.84).
  • Situation report No. 4: 1-page pdf document 'Situation report No. 4'; language en; mentions 4 place(s): Ward 20 Upton Vale (1), 27.68758, 85.33803 (1), Ward (1), Elmstead open space shelter (1).

Run this on your own data.

Sign up at lsm.geobit.ai, add your files, services and documents to a project, and get your own maps, charts and cited report.